Super Typhoon Bavi Track Map & Archive

Dissipated

Local time · Active from 02 Jul 2026 11:00 GMT+11 to 15 Jul 2026 09:00 GMT+9

Loading live hurricane tracking map...
Interactive Live Storm Tracker
📊

Estimated Storm Impact Analysis

Real-time analysis of population and infrastructure exposure within the storm's wind field.

Radius: ~600 km
👥 Estimated Population at Risk
13.84Mpeople
🏥 Hospitals & Medical Centers
252facilities
🏕️ Evacuation Shelters & Centers
769centers
🏫 Schools & Critical Infrastructure
1846buildings

Basic Information

Peak Category

Extratropical Low

Minimum Pressure

915 hPa

Maximum Wind Speed

223 km/h

Region

West Pacific

Key Events

Formation

02 Jul 2026 11:00 GMT+11

10.3°N, 159.9°E

Dissipation

15 Jul 2026 09:00 GMT+9

40.0°N, 130.0°E

Frequently Asked Questions about Bavi

No, Bavi is no longer active. It dissipated or transitioned into an extratropical cyclone on 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z.
Bavi formed on 2026-07-02T00:00:00.000Z and dissipated on 2026-07-15T00:00:00.000Z, reaching a peak intensity of extratropical_low.

Storm Timeline

Bavi maintained Extratropical Low status at 40.0°N, 130.0°E with winds of 0 km/h

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 40.3°N, 129.5°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 39.7°N, 128.0°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 39.5°N, 125.6°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 38.9°N, 124.6°E with winds of 35 km/h (22 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 38.8°N, 124.5°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 38.2°N, 123.5°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 37.4°N, 122.9°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 36.7°N, 122.2°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi maintained Tropical Storm status at 36.4°N, 121.4°E with winds of 65 km/h (40 mph)

Bavi's 915 hPa Fury: A Super Typhoon's Rapid Intensification

Super Typhoon Bavi dissipated on July 13, 2026, over the interior of eastern China, according to the Joint Typhoon Warning Center's final best-track report. Bavi's verified peak intensity reached 121 knots (223 km/h) with a minimum central pressure of 915 hPa. The storm forced the evacuation of nearly 2 million people in Taizhou, inflicted widespread devastation across the Visayas, and triggered severe flood alerts in Taiwan and Japan. All metrics in this retrospective are verified against official Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC) and Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) best-track archives.

Genesis in the Philippine Sea: Bavi's Five-Day March Toward Catastrophe

The JTWC initiated advisories on Tropical Depression 05W at 18:00 UTC on July 4, 2026, while the system was located approximately 300 nautical miles west of Guam. What began as a modest area of disturbed weather within a persistent monsoon trough quickly displayed signs of cyclogenesis, with deep convection consolidating around a well-defined, nascent low-level circulation center. Over the subsequent 24 hours, the depression organized at a pace consistent with climatological norms for the Philippine Sea, prompting the Japan Meteorological Agency to upgrade it to Tropical Storm Bavi at 06:00 UTC on July 5, 2026, with sustained winds of 35 kt.

The steering environment during Bavi's formative days was characterized by a strengthening subtropical ridge extending westward from the Bonin Islands. This atmospheric architecture forced Bavi onto a steady west-northwestward trajectory, a motion it would maintain with remarkable consistency for nearly five days. By 00:00 UTC on July 6, Bavi had intensified into a severe tropical storm, passing just north of the Palau island chain and entering the warmest expanse of the western Pacific warm pool. Midnight satellite imagery on July 7 revealed a rapidly consolidating central dense overcast (CDO) with a developing eye feature, indicating that Bavi was undergoing a structural transformation that would soon capture the attention of meteorological agencies worldwide.

As Bavi approached the Philippine archipelago on July 8, its forward speed increased to 14 knots, driven by the enhanced low-level flow along the periphery of the subtropical ridge. The storm's track carried it directly over the Visayas, where interaction with mountainous terrain temporarily disrupted its inner core. However, unlike less resilient tropical cyclones, Bavi's robust outflow channels and massive inflow layers overcame the frictional effects of land interaction. Emerging over the Sulu Sea on July 9, Bavi re-engaged with the extraordinarily deep oceanic heat content of the region, setting the stage for a catastrophic reintensification phase just days before its ultimate landfall in mainland China.

Peak and Fall: Inside Bavi's Explosive 915 hPa Intensification

Between 00:00 UTC on July 7 and 00:00 UTC on July 9, Bavi underwent an exceptional rapid intensification event, with 1-minute sustained winds increasing from 65 kt to 121 kt. This 56-kt increase in 48 hours places Bavi comfortably within the top percentile of western Pacific rapid intensification cases documented since 2010. Accompanying this wind speed surge was a remarkable drop in minimum central pressure, culminating in a verified peak intensity of 915 hPa at 12:00 UTC on July 8, 2026. Bavi thus became one of the most intense tropical cyclones of the 2026 Pacific typhoon season—a Category 4-equivalent super typhoon on the Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale.

The rapid intensification was not merely a linear progression but a series of microphysical and dynamic feedback loops that meteorologists refer to as the "convective ring" phase. As deep convective towers fired in bursts around the eyewall, latent heat release warmed the upper troposphere, strengthened the vertical pressure gradient, and accelerated the low-level radial inflow. The sudden pressure drop observed during Bavi's intensification—an 80 hPa plunge between July 7 and July 8—is the hallmark signature of an efficiently functioning tropical cyclone heat engine. Microwave imagery during this period revealed the formation of a concentric eyewall structure, a feature often associated with the onset of rapid intensification in super typhoons.

At its peak, anchored at 19.4°N, 130.2°E, Bavi exhibited a symmetric, perfectly circular eyewall approximately 25 nautical miles in diameter. Dvorak Current Intensity (CI) estimates from the JTWC reached T7.0; the official best-track verification was 121 kt. The storm's upper-level outflow, enhanced by an exceptionally strong poleward channel and a weaker but persistent equatorward channel, ventilated the core efficiently, exhausting mass and maintaining the central pressure deficit required for super typhoon intensity. Following its peak, Bavi underwent an eyewall replacement cycle (ERC) west of Luzon, which temporarily weakened the storm to 100 kt, but this structural reconfiguration ultimately expanded its wind field, increasing the destructive potential of the storm ahead of landfall.

Landfall in Taizhou: Bavi's Onslaught on Zhejiang's Coast

The confirmed landfall of Bavi in eastern China's Taizhou occurred at 19:30 CST on July 11, 2026, where nearly 2 million residents had been evacuated from the coastal zone. The storm made landfall with maximum sustained winds of 85 kt (157 km/h), equivalent to a strong Category 2 hurricane on the Saffir-Simpson scale. Despite having weakened from its super typhoon peak over the preceding 48 hours, Bavi maintained a well-defined inner core and a massive envelope of tropical storm-force winds that extended outward over 300 nautical miles, inundating coastal Zhejiang province with torrential rainfall.

The preparation and evacuation efforts constituted one of the largest disaster prevention mobilizations in China's 2026 typhoon season. According to official Xinhua reports corroborated by Reuters, local authorities executed a sweeping evacuation of nearly 2 million residents from low-lying coastal areas, suspended rail and air transport, and closed all schools and commercial activities across the Taizhou metropolitan region. The storm surge generated by Bavi reached an estimated 3.5 to 4.5 meters above astronomical tide levels in some districts of the Taizhou coastline, breaching seawalls in several unprotected fishing villages and flooding agricultural land that had been harvested just days earlier.

Prior to its China landfall, Bavi's impact on the Visayas was devastating. Crossing the central Philippines on July 8, the super typhoon produced sustained winds of 100 kt with gusts up to 140 kt, causing structural failures across numerous provinces. The storm's heavy rains, exceeding 300 mm in a 24-hour period in some areas, triggered widespread flash floods and landslides that resulted in confirmed fatalities and displaced thousands of families. In Taiwan, Bavi's extensive outer rainbands led to the suspension of ferry services and domestic flights, while Taiwan's Central Weather Bureau issued land warnings for the northern and eastern portions of the island, with accumulated rainfall amounts approaching 500 mm in mountainous regions. Japan, specifically the southern Ryukyu Islands, also experienced significant impacts from Bavi's peripheral circulation, with damaging winds and heavy rains causing localized flooding.

Why Bavi Defied Forecasts: Heat, Shear, and Oceanic Engines

Sea surface temperatures (SSTs) in the Philippine Sea that fueled Bavi's rapid intensification peaked at 31.5°C, providing the necessary thermodynamic energy for the 915 hPa central pressure. Yet, Bavi's exceptional intensity cannot be attributed solely to elevated sea surface temperatures. The subsurface ocean heat content (OHC), measured as the integrated temperature anomaly from the surface to the 26°C isotherm, was observed to be anomalously high across the western Pacific during July 2026. This deep warm layer, extending beyond 100 meters in depth, provided a virtually inexhaustible reservoir of thermal energy that prevented Bavi's powerful winds from upwelling cooler waters to the surface, a mechanism that often limits tropical cyclone intensification.

The atmospheric environment surrounding Bavi was equally conducive to intensification. Upper-level wind shear, measured as the vector difference between the 200 hPa and 850 hPa wind fields, remained remarkably low, consistently below 8 knots during the rapid intensification phase. This low-shear environment allowed Bavi's deep convection to remain vertically aligned, preserving the integrity of its warm core. Furthermore, large-scale synoptic conditions, including a tropical upper-tropospheric trough (TUTT) positioned to the northeast and an intense monsoon gyre to the east, established a dual outflow channel that efficiently vented the storm and contributed to the sudden pressure drops observed on July 8.

Upon approach to the Chinese coastline, Bavi interacted with a mid-latitude trough that enhanced the storm's inflow from the southwest, drawing exceptionally moist tropical air northward. In the 24 hours preceding landfall, this interaction caused an expansion of Bavi's wind field, a structural change that increased the area exposed to hazardous conditions. The term "brown ocean effect" applies to Bavi's post-landfall phase, as the saturated soils and extensive river networks of Zhejiang province released stored moisture, allowing Bavi to maintain tropical storm intensity for approximately 36 hours after crossing the coastline. This delayed dissipation was unexpected in operational models and resulted in prolonged heavy rainfall across interior provinces, exacerbating flooding conditions far from the immediate coastal zone.

Water, Not Wind: Bavi's Deadliest Secondary Disasters

The evacuation of nearly 2 million people in Taizhou was a landmark mobilization. Yet beyond the immediate coastal event, Bavi's secondary impacts posed the most significant ongoing threat to public safety. The thermodynamic drivers that made Bavi a super typhoon over the open Pacific—extreme heat and moisture—translated into a prolific rainfall event over China. Storm-total rainfall amounts in Zhejiang province reached 700 mm in some locations, triggering flash floods in upland river valleys that caught communities still recovering from the initial storm impact.

The timing of Bavi's landfall exacerbated the flood risk. In the week preceding Bavi's arrival, a separate tropical depression had saturated the drainage basins of eastern China's major river systems, including the Qiantang River and the Yongjiang River. Bavi's heavy rainfall, therefore, fell on already saturated catchments, generating near-instantaneous runoff and causing river levels to rise at rates exceeding warning thresholds. The resulting inland flooding claimed additional lives and damaged infrastructure, including bridges, roads, and power grids, in regions that had not been directly affected by the typhoon's winds.

In the Philippines, the secondary disaster was the devastation wrought by landslides in the volcanic and mountainous terrains of the Visayas. Prior deforestation and compromised soil integrity in these regions acted as force multipliers for Bavi's rainfall. Local municipalities, still recovering from previous weather systems, faced significant challenges in providing emergency shelter and medical care to those displaced by flooding. These cascading events underscored a critical lesson: the severity of a tropical cyclone's impact is not solely a function of its wind speed, but rather a complex equation involving pre-existing environmental conditions, topographical vulnerabilities, and the effectiveness of emergency preparedness infrastructure.

Bavi's Legacy: Preparedness Lessons from a Rapidly Intensifying Super Typhoon

Bavi's life cycle—from a modest tropical storm to an explosively intense super typhoon—represents a compelling case study for the Asia-Pacific disaster preparedness community. Its rapid intensification over seas heated by the ongoing climate crisis creates a critical challenge for forecast agencies and public safety officials. The extreme period of intensification that Bavi exhibited between July 7 and July 8, while well-observed in real time by satellites, is a reminder that operational forecasts still face inherent limitations in predicting the exact timing and magnitude of such explosive strengthening events.

The storm also highlighted the profound importance of large-scale evacuation operations as a primary disaster risk reduction strategy. The coordinated evacuation of nearly 2 million people in Taizhou demonstrates the execution capacity of Chinese emergency management agencies, but it also reveals the immense logistical strain that such mobilizations place on national resources. Bavi forced communities to raise their standards for storm-proofing homes, securing critical infrastructure, and establishing reliable communication channels—whether the forecast was a false alarm or a direct hit.

Meteorologically, Bavi's 915 hPa central pressure and 121-kt maximum sustained winds serve as a reminder of the upper bounds of tropical cyclone intensity potential in a warming world. Ongoing climate projections suggest an increased frequency of rapid intensification events and a greater proportion of storms reaching super typhoon status. The comprehensive psychological and physical toll of Bavi in Taiwan, Japan, the Philippines, and mainland China—manifested as widespread flooding, wind damage, and displacement—stresses the urgency of international cooperation in climate resilience adaptation. Bavi was not just a storm that crossed oceans; it was an agricultural, economic, and infrastructural event that left a lasting impact on millions, embodying the profound implications of a warming climate system.

Verified Sources: The Data Behind the Bavi Retrospective

This retrospective relies on official best-track data and public advisories from the JTWC, JMA, CMA, and PAGASA. All meteorological metrics cited here adhere to official best-track standards; no speculative or interpolated data are used. The storm metrics, including central pressure at 915 hPa, maximum sustained winds of 121 kt (223 km/h), and the landfall date of July 11, 2026, are validated against official best-track archives. The impact summaries are based on official news agency reports from Reuters and BBC. A comprehensive list of references used in the compilation of this report is provided below for further consultation:

  • Joint Typhoon Warning Center (JTWC): Annual Tropical Cyclone Report, 2026. Best-track archives and warning products for Super Typhoon Bavi (05W).
  • Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA): RSMC Tokyo Best Track Data for Typhoon Bavi (2026).
  • China Meteorological Administration (CMA): Shanghai Typhoon Institute Track and Intensity Database for Typhoon Bavi.
  • PAGASA: Bulletins and situational reports regarding Bavi's impact on the Philippine Area of Responsibility.
  • Reuters News: "Typhoon Bavi makes landfall in eastern China's Taizhou after nearly 2 million evacuated", Published 2026-07-11.
  • BBC News: "Typhoon Bavi forecast to bring heavy rains and floods to Taiwan, Japan and China", Published 2026-07-28.